Just before bed last night, I remembered I had to send a message to my brother, who, thanks to the time difference, would already be celebrating his birthday in Australia. I typed a âhappy birthdayâ message, followed by a string of emojis: a balloon, two beer glasses and a cake with candles. đđťđ
Pretty straightforward stuff. My brother got the message â that I was celebrating with him digitally and would, of course, much prefer to bake him a cake and say cheers in person. I could have said all that in words. I could have told him Iâd like to have a party together to celebrate, and that Iâd bring a huge sugary cake for the occasion, if only we werenât continents apart. Instead, I chose to use three tiny pictures. Lazy? Possibly. An insult to the English language? Perhaps. Effective? Undoubtedly.
I have purist tendencies when it comes to English, but I like emojis. I think they function brilliantly as a universal language and play an important supporting role to traditional languages in the digital age.
I can remember when the smiley face that appeared in The Matrix brought emoticons to my attention. đ (These representations of faces using punctuation marks had been around since 1972, but they didnât fall into mainstream use for many years.) Fast-forward a decade and I was sitting in a writing workshop being told that to use emoticons was to risk being seen as unprofessional and even childish. Fast-forward another decade and Iâm signing off work emails with an animated smiley.
I try to fight my purist tendencies. When the AP said âoverâ and âmore thanâ are both ok for quantities, I attempted to accept it (this is a work in progress). I read David Crystalâs Txtng: The Gr8 Db8 and came around to his thinking (though I still use full sentences in my messages). Emojis havenât given me as much of a problem; maybe itâs because theyâre so universal and so useful.
Emojis are part of Unicode â a worldwide standard that contains 137,439 characters. Assuming the meaning of an emoji is clear, that means I can potentially communicate a message to any Unicode user in the world, regardless of what language they speak, using emojis. I can also use them to clarify a message Iâm sharing in English to someone who has a different native tongue â a winking emoji to show Iâm kidding, for example.
That does assume the recipient âspeaksâ emoji, of course. Not everyone does.
Thereâs a Wiki that explains all the meanings: emojipedia.org is really useful if youâre not sure. Or, if youâre like my friend Emily, you could just go ahead and make your own meanings.
đ¤ This is the Prawn of Love.
ă˝ď¸ And this âpart alternationâ symbol, which looks like a big gold M, means Murakami (everything is relevant and nothing is relevant and itâs all connected⌠long story).
I digress.
Today isnât just my brotherâs birthday; itâs World Emoji Day. People all around the world are celebrating the weird and wonderful visual language thatâs evolved over the last couple of decades to help us out in times of textual trouble â to avoid (or fix) a misunderstanding, to get a message across quickly or to clarify tone. There are all sorts of âIRLâ events happening (including an emoji-themed musical in New York), as well as the more predictable online stuff.
This all seems a bit weird, but just think about how ingrained emojis have become in our lives: if youâve got a smartphone or a computer itâs a sure bet that youâve received an emoji, even if you havenât used one. People have poo emoji pillows and laughing emoji key rings. Emojis have gone from being in the realm of the digitally clued-up to being on the shelves of our most ubiquitous superstores. And let’s not forget the OED’s word of the year in 2015 was đ.
Love them or hate them, why not take a moment today to think about emojis and how theyâre changing the way we communicate. Where will they take us next?
đđŁđ đ
(In case you missed the link in the first paragraph, Iâve decided to use the plural emojis. Hereâs an interesting article about the question of emoji plurality.)